Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 F.3d 903 - United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.

United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.’s Empirical Analysis

340 F.3d 903 · 2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
December 2007
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Nevada v. United States · California v. United States · Albert H. Wohlers & Co. v. Bartgis · In Re Waters of Manse Spring · Revert v. Ray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “); United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co., 291 F.3d 1062 (9th Cir.2002) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.