Michael Brown v. Kenneth McKee’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Brady v. United States · Santobello v. New York · McCarthy v. United States · Maples v. Stegall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the state court did not decide the due process claim, we review this claim de novo. Although the district court regarded the state courts’ decisions denying relief as implicitly holding that Brown’s plea was knowing and voluntary, see Brown, 2007 WL 2421557 , at , none of the state-court holdings addressed Brown’s properly preserved due-process claim. AEDPA deference is therefore not applicable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brown v. McKee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.