Holloway v. Parham’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2281 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 604 (§ 404 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 606 (§ 406 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Rosado v. Wyman · King v. Smith · Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Jacobsen · Demarco v. Edens · Doe v. Shapiro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Since this construction of Ga. Code Ann. § 99-2912 (b) requires the Director to waive repayment if there is need, it does not allow restitution from needy dependent children for the misconduct of their parents. Thus, Ga. Code Ann. § 99-2912 (b) is consistent with the provisions of the Social Security Act [ 42 U.S.C. § 602 (a) (10)] and HEW regulations [45 C.F.R. 233.20 (a)(8)(ii)(d)].””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““(b) Any person who obtains any payment of public assistance to which he is not entitled, or in excess of that to which he is entitled, shall be liable to repay such sum, or if continued on assistance shall have future grants proportionately reduced until the excess amount received has been repaid. In any case in which, under this section, a person is liable to repay any sum, such sum may be collected without interest by civil action brought in the name of the Department of Family and Children Services of the State of Georgia. Any repayment required by this subsection may, in the discretion of the Director of the Department of Family and Children Services, be waived in whole or in part, upon a finding by the Director of the Department of Family and Children Services that such repayment would deprive such person, his spouse, parent, or child of shelter or subsistence needed to enable such person, spouse, parent, or child to maintain a minimum standard of health and well-being.” (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Harrell v. Harder““The record clearly indicates that defendant made no such showing and that the defendant’s hearing officer did not make any determination as to a change in the ‘need’ of plaintiff and her children. Therefore, this court finds that defendant invalidly applied Ga. Code Ann. § 99-2912 (b) to plaintiff and her children. Accordingly, the case is remanded to defendant with the instruction that absent a finding that there has been a change in ‘need’ of plaintiff and her children, defendant is to waive repayment.” 340 F. Supp. 344 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.