Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 FSUPP 383 - United States v. Willoz

United States v. Willoz’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
August 1972
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 4412 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206

Relies on Harris v. New York · Marchetti v. United States · Dennis v. United States · Grosso v. United States · Frey v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If, upon remand, the district court finds that the supplemental Form 11-C was the product of duress by Agent Perry rather than a voluntary exercise of the will of the defendant Willoz, then the verdict and consequent judgment must be vacated and the indictment against Willoz dismissed. If the Court reaches a contrary determination, the conviction shall stand affirmed by this court as entered.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.