340 F. Supp. 2d 279 - Adams v. Suozzi’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · Perry v. Thomas · Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“states that the County may institute a lag payroll in calendar year 2000, which had lapsed by the time the [CBA Memorandum] was executed in August 2001.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Adams v. Suozzi“[i]n enacting the [FAA], Congress created national substantive law governing all questions of the validity and enforceability of arbitration agreements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Adams v. Suozzi“that would allow the County to defer ten days of pay for each union employee”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Adams v. Suozzi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.