340 Ga. App. 652 - Davis v. the State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. Doe · Kent v. Dulles · Conroy v. Aniskoff · Williams v. Fears · Ex Parte: in the Matter of William Wells on a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“like deportation, registration as a sex offender is intimately related to the criminal process in that it is an automatic result following certain criminal convictions. OCGA § 42-1-12 (e) provides that registration shall be required by any individual who is convicted of certain designated criminal offenses, and we have emphasized that Georgia law makes registration mandatory for specified categories of convicted criminals. Hence, our law has enmeshed criminal convictions and sex offender registration such that it is most difficult to divorce the requirement of registration from the underlying criminal conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis“'an incapacity in the eye of the law, or created by law; a restriction framed to prevent any person or class of persons from sharing in duties or privileges which would otherwise be open to them; legal disqualification.' " Davis , supra, 340 Ga. App. at 658 , 798 S.E.2d 474 (quoting The Compact Oxford English Dictionary 440 (2d ed. 1991) ). 7 The State acknowledges that no "exhaustive list”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis“Except as otherwise provided in this Paragraph, the State Board of Pardons and Paroles shall be vested with the power of executive clemency, including the powers to grant reprieves, pardons, and paroles; to commute penalties; to remove disabilities imposed by law; and to remit any part of a sentence for any offense against the state after conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.