The State v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jenkins v. State · 244 Ga. App. 836 - Beasley v. State · 310 Ga. App. 48 - Scales v. State · 299 Ga. App. 377 - Flournoy v. State · State v. Boykin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The tolling provision found in OCGA § 17-3-2 (2) requires proof that the person who committed the crime was 'unknown,' and when this exception is relied upon, the tolling period ends when the State acquires 'actual knowledge' of the defendant's identity.... [T]he General Assembly intended for the 'person unknown' tolling exception to apply to a situation where there is no identified suspect among the universe of all potential suspects. Thus, the tolling exception to the statute of limitation[ ] cannot be based upon the subjective opinion of the district attorney as to whether there was enough evidence to file charges against a particular person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lynch v. State“[t]he person committing the crime is unknown or the crime is unknown[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lynch v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.