Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 GAAPP 865 - Harris v. State

Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Jackson v. Denno · Olds v. State · Parker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Exclusion of proof of other acts that are too remote in time caters principally to the dual concerns for relevance and reliability. The evaluation of the proffered evidence in light of these concerns must be made on a case-by-case basis to determine whether the significance of the prior acts has become too attenuated and whether the memories of the witnesses has likely become too frail. Neither [Federal Rule of Evidence] 403 nor any analogous Rule provides any bright-line rule as to how old is too old. 20”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]here the court gives a curative instruction and the defendant neither objects to the curative instruction nor renews his motion for mistrial, the issue is not preserved for appellate review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “did not directly address the victim's credibility or express an opinion as to whether the child had actually been sexually abused”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.