Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 Ill. 118 - Brown v. Vankeuren

Brown v. Vankeuren’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
3
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently January 2009 · most notably In re Marriage of Verdung (1989), Morgan v. Parents of M.M. (1993)

2 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

24019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rabbitt v. Frank C. Weber & Co. · People Ex Rel. Akin v. Southern Gem Co. · Kinsloe v. Pogue · People ex rel. Loomis v. Wilkinson · Hook v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “£ £ The -only office which the common law writ of certiorari performs is to bring before the court the record of the proceedings of an inferior tribunal for an inspection by a superior tribunal. The superior tribunal, upon an inspection of the record, alone, when the writ is sufficient and the writ has been properly issued, determines whether the inferior tribunal had jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter, and whether it has exceeded its jurisdiction or has otherwise proceeded in violation of law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The petition required to put the court in motion and give it jurisdiction must be in conformity with the statute granting the right and must show all the facts necessary to authorize it to act, — i.e., it must contain all the statements which the statute says the petition shall state, — and if the petition fails to contain all of these essential elements the court is without jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.