Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 district · 65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably Philip Morris Inc. v. Angeletti (2000), Armstead v. State (1996)
2 district · 65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kuntz v. City of Dayton · Dothard v. Rawlinson · Graves v. United States · LaRocca v. United States · Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Broyles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the impeachment value of the prior crime; (2) the point in time of the conviction and the defendant’s subsequent history; (3) the similarity between the past crime and the charged crime; (4) the importance of the defendant’s testimony; and (5) the centrality of the defendant’s credibility.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that the witness has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted if elicited from the witness or established by public record during examination of the witness, but only if (1) the crime was an infamous crime or other crime relevant to the witness’s credibility and (2) the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs the danger of unfair prejudice to the witness or the objecting party.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“"(a) Generally. For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that the witness has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted if elicited from the witness or established by public record during examination of the witness, but only if (1) the crime was an infamous crime or other crime relevant to the witness's credibility and (2) the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs the danger of unfair prejudice to the witness or the objecting party. “(b) Time limit. Evidence of a conviction is not admissible under this Rule if a period of more than 15 years has elapsed since the date of the conviction. “(c) Other limitations. Evidence of a conviction otherwise admissible under section (a) of this Rule shall be excluded if: "(1) the conviction has been reversed or vacated. “(2) the conviction has been the subject of a pardon; or "(3) an appeal or application for leave to appeal from the judgment of conviction is pending, or the time for noting an appeal or filing an application for leave to appeal has not expired. “(d) Effect of plea of nolo contendere. For purposes of this Rule, 'conviction' includes a plea of nolo contendere followed by a sentence, whether or not the sentence is suspended.””
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Dallas v. State · Brown v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.