Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 Mo. 721 - Hardt v. City Ice & Fuel Co.

Hardt v. City Ice & Fuel Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
July 1968
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 1968 · most notably Hunter v. Hunter (1946), Scannell v. Fulton Iron Works Company (1956)

25 state decisions

1601937194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stuart v. Stuart · Shroyer v. Missouri Livestock Commission Co. · Platies v. Theodorow Bakery Co. · Hohlstein Ex Rel. Hohlstein v. St. Louis Roofing Co. · Vordick v. Vordick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If we have jurisdiction of this cause, it is because the amount in dispute, exclusive of costs, exceeds $7,500. The award in this case was $20 per week for 300 weeks, or a total of $6,000 and $13.50 per week thereafter for life. Can it be said with certainty that the respondent will live 300 weeks and then long enough thereafter so that he will receive a sum in excess of $7,500? We think not. Our jurisdiction attaches when, and only when, the record of the trial court affirmatively shows that there is involved in the controversy, independent of all contingencies, an amount exceeding $7,500, exclusive of costs. * * * Tested by this rule, we cannot say that, independent of all contingencies, the amount in dispute is more than $6,000.” loc. cit. at page 593.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.