State v. Larrimore’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
130 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 130 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably State v. Fair (2001), State v. Grooms (2000)
130 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Powers v. Ohio · Soberon v. United States · Iannelli v. United States · Houltin v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 130 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[U]nless it is apparent that such infraction of the rules might reasonably have had a prejudicial effect on the result of the trial, the error will be considered harmless.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“In evaluating whether a judge's comments cross into the realm of impermissible opinion, a totality of the circumstances test is utilized.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“Permitting the jury to act as the voice and conscience of the community is required because the very reason for the jury system is to temper the harshness of the law with the 'commonsense judgment of the community.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.