State v. Bowie’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably State v. Gainey (2002), State v. Thomas (1999)
2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Soberon v. United States · Robbins v. North Carolina · State v. McCollum · International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 406 v. Guidry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant's immaturity, youthfulness, or lack of emotional or intellectual development at the time of the crime must also be considered.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bowie v. Branker · State v. Zuniga“`the court cured any error by its action in sustaining the objection and giving the curative instruction.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.