Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 N.C. 229 - State v. Truesdale

State v. Truesdale’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently October 2011 · most notably Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co. (2008), State v. Parker (2001)

60 state decisions

300199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants · State v. Stager · McDonald v. Missouri · State v. Bonney · State v. Cummings

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In ruling on a motion to dismiss a first-degree murder charge, the trial court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the State and give the State every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. State v. Jackson, 317 N.C. 1, 22 , 343 S.E.2d 814, 827 (1986), judgment vacated on other grounds, 479 U.S. 1077 , 94 L. Ed. 2d 133 (1987). Substantial evidence must be introduced tending to prove the essential elements of the crime charged and that defendant was the perpetrator. Id. The evidence may contain contradictions or discrepancies; these are for the jury to resolve and do not require dismissal. Id. at 22-23, 343 S.E.2d at 827 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘Premeditation means that [the] defendant formed the specific intent to kill the victim for some length of time, however short, before the actual killing.’ ” “ ‘Deliberation’ means that the defendant formed the intent to kill in a cool state of blood and not as a result of a violent passion due to sufficient provocation.’ ” “Specific intent to kill is an essential element of first degree murder, but it is also a necessary constituent of the elements of premeditation and deliberation.” “Thus, proof of premeditation and deliberation is also proof of intent to kill.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the defendant formed the specific intent to kill the victim some period of time, however short, before the actual killing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.