State v. Leach’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited
25 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Bonney · State v. Cummings · State v. Myers · State v. Hamlet · Avriett v. Avriett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Premeditation and deliberation] may be proved by proof of a circumstance from which they may be inferred such as a lack of provocation by the [v]ictim; conduct of the [defendant before, during and after the killing; threats and declarations of the defendant; use of grossly excessive force or vicious circumstances of the killing or the manner or means by which the killing was done.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Elliott · State v. Rich“The instruction in question informs a jury that the circumstances given are only illustrative; they are merely examples of some circumstances which, if shown to exist, permit premeditation and deliberation to be inferred. The instruction tells jurors that they “may” find premeditation and deliberation from certain circumstances, “such as” the circumstances listed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rich
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.