Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 N.C. 264 - State v. White

State v. White’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

186
cited by 186 later decisions
6
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 183 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 186 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably State v. Braxton (2000), State v. Bishop (1997)

3 federal appellate · 183 state decisions

1000199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Ake v. Oklahoma · Victor v. Nebraska · Cage v. Louisiana · Mayers v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 186 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake, entrapment or accident.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “a clear general rule of inclusion of relevant evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts by a defendant, subject to but one exception requiring its exclusion if its only probative value is to show that the defendant has the propensity or disposition to commit an offense of the nature of the crime charged.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “as long as it is relevant to any fact or issue other than the defendant's propensity to commit the crime.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.