State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably State v. Fowler (2001), State v. Chandler (1996)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Wilkerson · State v. Smith · State v. Taylor · State v. Weeks · State v. Barts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Determining whether the State failed to comply with discovery is a decision left to the sound discretion of the trial court.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“afforded the defense opportunity to meet [previously undisclosed lay opinion testimonial] evidence”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The admissibility of evidence is first governed by Rule 401 of the Rules of Evidence, which defines relevant evidence as that which has “any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.” N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 401 (1992). Rule 702 sets the standard for the admissibility of expert opinion testimony, specifying that a witness qualified as an expert may testify as to scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge if such testimony “will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.” N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 702 (1992).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Burgess
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.