State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
76 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably State v. Mumford (2010), State v. Chandler (1996)
76 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · North Star Steel Co. v. Thomas · State v. Smith · State v. Powell · State v. McCollum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he amount of restitution recommended by the trial court must be supported by evidence adduced at trial or at sentencing.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“[r]egardless of whether restitution is ordered or recommended by the trial court, the amount must be supported by the evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"There is no statutory requirement for a sentencing judge to inquire into a defendant's ability to pay restitution when the judge merely recommends restitution as a condition of parole or work release." We conclude, therefore, that the trial court did not err in failing to consider defendant's ability to pay restitution, as the potentially binding determination at a later date requiring defendant to pay restitution as a condition of work release or parole by either the Department of Correction or the Parole Commission will by necessity require sufficient evidence of defendant's ability to pay at that time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.