340 N.J. Super. 204 - State v. Munoz’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
May 2014
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · United States v. Young · Newland v. Georgia · Holm v. United States · State v. Roth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A prosecutor is permitted to respond to an argument raised by the defense so long as it does not constitute a foray beyond the evidence adduced at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“sufficiently egregious to deprive defendant of his right to a fair trial,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.