State v. Tussing’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1989
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Worley · State v. Burtlow · State v. Newman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The use of a financial instrument with the intent to obtain fraudulently anything of value by one who knows that the instrument is not what it purports to be, or who knows that he or she is not the person nor the authorized agent of the person who, as shown on the instrument, has the right to so use the instrument, shall constitute the false use of a financial instrument. 1”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martin“Any letter, credit card, charge plate, or other device ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Propps
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.