Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 N.W.2d 36 - Buzzell v. Libi

Buzzell v. Libi’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2016

22 state decisions

1101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Phelps Dodge Corp. v. AFL-CIO Joint Negotiating Committee · Schloendorff v. Society of the New York Hospital · Canterbury v. Spence · Bing v. Thunig · Sard v. Hardy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The trial court, because it is involved in the action from its inception, is in a much better position to determine the reasonableness and necessity of the costs and disbursements sought by the prevailing party. It is thus for the trial court to make the initial determination of costs to be awarded, and its decision will be overturned on appeal only if an abuse of discretion is shown. Moser v. Wilhelm, 300 N.W.2d 840 (N.D.1980).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.