State v. Kluck’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““1. It is an affirmative defense that the defendant was entrapped into committing the offense. “2. Entrapment occurs when a law enforcement agent induces the commission of an offense, using persuasion or other means likely to cause normally law-abiding persons to commit the offense. Conduct merely affording á person an opportunity to commit an offense does not constitute entrapment. “3. In this section ‘law enforcement agent’ includes personnel of federal and local law enforcement agencies as well as state agencies, and any person cooperating with such an agency.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Rehling · State v. Weisz

2. ““... we do not weigh such evidence, nor •do we judge the credibility of witnesses; instead, we look only to the evidence most favorable to the verdict and the reasonable inferences therefrom to see if there is substantial evidence to warrant a conviction.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Overby · State v. Moore