State v. Roble-Baker’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
4
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Article I, section 12, provides, in part, that `no person shall be * * * compelled in any criminal prosecution to testify against himself.' To protect a person's right against compelled self-incrimination under that section, this court has held that, before questioning, police must give Miranda warnings to a person who is in `full custody' or in circumstances that `create a setting which judges would and officers should recognize to be `compelling.'"”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“"in determining whether the police placed a defendant in compelling circumstances, this court will consider all the circumstances, and its overarching inquiry is whether the officers created the sort of police-dominated atmosphere that Miranda warnings were intended to counteract. See Magee, 304 Or. at 264-65 , 744 P.2d 250 (recognizing that state Miranda requirement protects same interests as federal requirement); Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 455-57 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) (explaining that warnings are necessary to ensure that a person's statement is truly the product of free choice when that person is placed in an `incommunicado police-dominated atmosphere')."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“must show that defendant's unwarned statements were not made while she was in compelling circumstances, and the reviewing court must determine the point at which, if ever, the circumstances became compelling,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.