Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 S.C. 460 - Parker v. Shecut

Parker v. Shecut’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of Greenville · Tupper v. Dorchester County · SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. Cox · Future Group, II v. Nationsbank · Grant v. South Carolina Coastal Council

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Code of Judicial Conduct requires a judge to ‘disqualify himself in a proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. Canon 3(C)(1) of the Code of Judicial Conduct, Rule 501, SCACR. A judge must exercise sound judicial discretion in determining whether his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.’ Absent evidence of judicial prejudice, a judge’s failure to disqualify himself will not be reversed on appeal. It is not enough for a party seeking disqualification to simply allege bias. The party must show some evidence of bias. Furthermore, the alleged bias must be personal, as distinguished from judicial, in nature.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The failure to prove any one of these elements is fatal to the claim. Generally, the representation must relate to a pres ent or pre-existing fact rather than a statement of future events or an unfulfilled promise. An exception to the general rule is recognized for unfulfilled promises which were made by a party who never intended to fulfill the promise and only made it to induce the performance of another party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.