Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 SO2D 1001 - Blanchard v. Rodrigue

Blanchard v. Rodrigue’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
3
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Haley v. Pan American World Airways, Inc. (1984), Murphy v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. (1980)

4 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

26019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co. · Viator v. Gilbert · McFarland v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. · 186 So. 2d 328 - Doty v. Central Mutual Insurance Company · Phillips v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The settled jurisprudence of this state is that damages for loss of support are speculative in nature and cannot be calculated with mathematical certainty. The most a Court can do in such cases is to exercise sound judicial discretion and award an amount which, considering all the circumstances, seems just to both parties and is not unduly oppressive to either. Viator v. Gilbert, 253 La. 81 , 216 So.2d 821 (1968); McFarland v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, 241 La. 15 , 127 So.2d 183 (1961). "Factors which should be weighed in determining the amount due for loss of support include the decedent's present earnings, his age and life expectancy, his work-life expectancy, the possibility of a decrease or increase in his earnings, the decedent's job security, the nature of decedent's work, his health, his relationship with his family, his personal expenses and his past work record. Other factors are the surviving spouse's age and health, the minor children's age, and the effects of inflation and the need to discount future earnings to a present day amount. In short, all factors relevant to a determination of the amount of the loss of support due to the premature demise of the decedent should be considered."”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the insured has other insurance against a loss covered by this policy, the Company shall not be liable to the insured hereunder for a greater proportion of such loss than the amount which would have been payable under this policy, had no such other insurance existed, bears to the sum of said amount and the amounts which would have been payable under each other policy applicable to such loss, had each such policy been the only policy so applicable. Policy No. 94 C 54167 CAA, Conditions § 10.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"It is well established that the negligence of a bailee cannot be imputed to the bailor. It follows that the defendants are liable if the driver of the obstructing R C Cola truck was negligent and that negligence was a legal cause of the collision. When the actionable negligence of two tort feasors contributes in causing harm to a third party, each of them is responsible for the damage. They are solidarily liable."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.