Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 So. 2d 1382 - State v. Williams

340 So. 2d 1382 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
October 1995
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 1995 · most notably State v. Sepulvado (1979), 369 So. 2d 118 - State v. Cox (1979)

28 state decisions

180197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Furman v. Georgia · Robinson v. State of California · Trop v. Dulles · Weems v. United States · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] sentence shall not be set aside on the ground that it inflicts cruel or unusual punishment unless the statute under which it is imposed is found unconstitutional.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`Mandatory penalties are particularly suspect because they frequently have no relation to the magnitude of the offense.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`though not cruel or unusual, are too severe as punishment for certain conduct and thus unconstitutional.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.