Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 So. 2d 378 - Chamblee v. Chamblee

340 So. 2d 378 - Chamblee v. Chamblee’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2009

18 state decisions

1001976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Villas, Inc. v. Reese · Gilberti v. Gilberti · Sampognaro v. Sampognaro · 188 So. 2d 224 - Sciortino v. Sciortino · 336 So. 2d 912 - Loyd v. Loyd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Art. 1974. Delay for applying for new trial "The delay for applying for a new trial shall be seven days, exclusive of legal holdings. Except as otherwise provided in the second paragraph hereof, this delay commences to run on the day after the judgment was signed. "When notice of the judgment is required under Article 1913, the delay for applying for a new trial commences to run on the day after the clerk has mailed, or the sheriff has served, the notice of judgment as required by Article 1913."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"Although `leaving' may be the harbinger of abandonment, there are many instances where such is not the case. Often the `leaving' party has `left' the matrimonial domicile completely free of any `fault' and has taken himself (or herself) away from the matrimonial domicile to prevent added financial drain, the uprooting of children, the uprooting of elderly parents, the overall social implications, etc., etc."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"premature, not timely, and, thus, without legal effect. Hence, this matter falls under subsection (1) of Art. 2087. Accordingly, under LSA-C.C.P. Art. 1974, the delay for a new trial commences to run on the day after the judgment was signed ..."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.