Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 SW2D 847 - Filipp v. Ochoa

Filipp v. Ochoa’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 1981
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1981

5 state decisions

30196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wichita City Lines, Inc. v. Puckett · Fort Worth & Denver Ry. Co. v. Ferguson · Dale Truck Line, Inc. v. R. & M. Well Servicing & Drilling Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellee filed an unverified plea alleging that on a date nearly one month after the suit was filed, plaintiff executed a release discharging defendant from all liability for property damage. Appellant then pleaded that appellee had full notice of the subrogation interest of the insurer before he executed the release. Appel-lee’s allegations of the terms of the release were embodied in an unverified pleading termed a ‘motion to dismiss.’ The court granted the motion and dismissed the action by virtue of the pleaded release. The court was not authorized to summarily dispose of the action on a plea in bar.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.