Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 S.W.3d 327 - State v. Shinkle

State v. Shinkle’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on J.C.W. Ex Rel. Webb v. Wyciskalla · State v. Silvey · Hagan v. State · State v. Gardner · State v. Langdon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if for the purpose of depriving the owner of a lawful interest therein, he or she receives, retains or disposes of property of another knowing that it has been stolen, or believing that it has been stolen.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hether the defendant received multiple items of stolen property on one or more occasions is relevant only in determining whether the defendant's double jeopardy rights were violated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Because double jeopardy is an affirmative defense, it is the defendant's burden to prove that double jeopardy applies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.