Baugh v. Novak’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. Voigt · Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co. · Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Chicago Milwaukee St Paul Railway Company · Lazenby Ex Rel. Lazenby v. Universal Underwriters Insurance · Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a general matter, the issues addressed by the appellate courts should be limited to those that have been raised and litigated in the lower courts, and which have been fully briefed and argued in the appellate courts.”) (citations omitted). Given the procedural posture of this case, this issue must await another day. We do note, however, that although this Court has not had occasion to fully explore the specific contours of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, we have generally observed that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.