Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 340 SW3D 743 - Gear v. State

Gear v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

68 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler))

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brooks v. State · Hooper v. State · Laster v. State · Samadi v. Oliver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we view all of the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Each fact need not point directly and independently to the guilt of the appellant, as long as the cumulative force of all the incriminating circumstances is sufficient to support the conviction.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to draw reasonable inferences from basic facts to ultimate facts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.