Max Protetch, Inc. v. Herrin’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 125th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall · BMC Software Belgium, NV v. Marchand · Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance, Ltd. v. English China Clays, P.L.C.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In addition to other acts that may constitute doing business, a nonresident does business in this state, if the nonresident: (1) contracts by mail or otherwise with a Texas resident and either party is to perform the contract in whole or in part in this state; (2) commits a tort in whole or in part in this state; or (3) recruits Texas residents, directly or through an intermediary located in this state, for employment inside or outside this state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.