State v. Boyden’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 150 Wis. 2d 688 - State v. Blalock · State v. Harbor · 113 Wis. 2d 662 - State v. MacEmon · 2003 WI App 199 - State v. Torres · State v. Doe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because it was not then in existence or because, even though it was then in existence, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'Deciding a motion for sentence modification based on a new factor is a two-step inquiry.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Armstrong“'whether that new factor justifies modification of the sentence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Armstrong
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.