Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 341 Ark. 577 - Frank v. Barker

Frank v. Barker’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Foster v. Jefferson County Quorum Court · Hoyle v. Faucher · Barker v. Frank · Rhodes v. Torres · Carson v. Weiss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As we interpret a provision of the Arkansas Constitution, we have said that when the language of a provision is plain and unambiguous, each word must be given its obvious and common meaning, and neither rules of construction nor rules of interpretation may be used to defeat the clear and certain meaning of a constitutional provision. Hoyle v. Faucher, 334 Ark. 529 , 975 S.W.2d 843 (1998).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.