Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

341 F.2d 109

Docket No. 21145.

Hardesty v. Sloane

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-02-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1965

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1965-02-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Walter C. Dunigan, Coral Gables, Fla., for appellants.

Herbert E. Kaufman, Miami, Fla., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and MOORE* and BELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The only issues raised by this appeal are issues of fact. Their resolution by the district court appears to be supported by substantial evidence. There the matter ends.

¶2

The judgment is affirmed.

Notes:

*

Of the Second Circuit, sitting by designation

/341/f2d/109 · .json · Public domain