Beatrice Martens v. Lyman G. Winder’s Empirical Analysis
341 F.2d 197 · 1965
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2002
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(f) * * * All process * * * may be served anywhere within the territorial limits of the state in which the district court is held, and, when authorized by a statute of the United States or by these rules, beyond the territorial limits of that state. * * ” (Emphasis supplied.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Rule 12 ... eliminat[es] the distinction between general and special appearanees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.