Benjamin R. Loye, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Denver United States National Bank, in the Matter of Carl Luchetta, Jr., Bankrupt’s Empirical Analysis
341 F.2d 402 · 1965
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2006
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chandler v. Occidental Petroleum Corp. · Bearden v. United States · Penn-Dixie Cement Corporation v. J. M. Dickinson, Commissioner of Finance and Taxation of Tennessee · Potucek v. Lourdes · Porter v. Searle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under our former policy in Colorado, the validity of chattel mortgages as to innocent third parties was dependent on recording or filing them in the office of the proper county clerk, analogous to the provisions for protection of title to real estate. However, the mobility of motor vehicles and their frequent sale in states far distant from the county of the mortgage filing has resulted in a new method of protection by means of showing mortgages on the title certificate, which can be carried with the car, rather than by record in the files of a distant and probably unknown county.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sifuentes v. Weed“the purpose of the [CCTA] was to provide a simple and effective means of ascertaining the title to and interests in motor vehicles and this means an examination of the title certificate itself. In other words, the provision in the [CCTA] requiring notation on the title certificate of the filed chattel mortgage was designed to make that certificate conclusive as to the rights of the parties with respect to the matter of notice of prior encumbrances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.