Azzone v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
341 F.2d 417 · 1965
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Wright v. United States (1984), Booker v. Arkansas (1967)
28 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1073 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United State v. Morgan · Rodriguez v. New York · Heflin v. United States · Pauling v. McElroy · United States v. Garguilo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Inasmuch as any relief to which appellant may be entitled is not available through Sec. 2255 or habeas corpus proceedings, ... appellant's motion is entitled to be treated as an application for a writ of error coram nobis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.