No 15378’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2020
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Foman v. Davis · United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Arbitration is a matter of contract and a party can not be required to submit to arbitration any dispute which he has not agreed so to submit. Whether or not a party to a contract is bound to arbitrate, as well as what issues it must arbitrate, is a matter to be determined by the Court, not by the arbitrator, on the basis of the contract entered into by the parties. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Nav. Co., 363 U.S. 574 , 582, 80 S.Ct. 1347 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1409 ; Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co., 370 U.S. 238 , 241, 82 S.Ct. 1318 , 8 L.Ed.2d 462 ; John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston, etc., 376 U.S. 543 , 546-547, 84 S.Ct. 909 , 11 L.Ed.2d 898 .” Retail Clerks International Ass’n, Etc. v. Lion Dry Goods, 341 F.2d 715 , 719-720 (6th Cir. 1965).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ny individual employee who may have a grievance,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.