In re Vandergrift

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Feb. 19, 1965.

Decided March 4, 1965.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-03-04

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1982

4 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on In re Vandergrift

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1965-03-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Howard I. Scott and Kountz, Fry & Meyer, Pittsburgh, Pa. (A. E. Kountz, Lawrence B. Niemann, Tice F. Ryan, Jr., and Ryan, Newman Geer & Goldring, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

¶2Henry C. Herchenroether, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa. (Alter, Wright & Barron, Pittsburgh, Pa., James F. McMullan, Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for ap-pellees.

¶3Before KALODNER and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5On review of the record we find no error.

¶6The Order of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated in the Opinion of Judge Wilson reported at 232 F.Supp. 857 (W.D.Pa.1964).