Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 341 F.2d 961 - In re Excel Stores, Inc.

In re Excel Stores, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

341 F.2d 961 · 1965

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
9
states following
May 2004
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 9 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently May 2004 · most notably Brushwood v. Citizens Bank (1981), Van Dusen Acceptance Corp. v. Gough (1972)

27 federal appellate · 9 district · 10 state decisions

37019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Benedict v. Ratner · Benedict v. Ratner · General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Haley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(5) A financing statement substantially complying with the requirements of this section is effective even though it contains minor errors which are not seriously misleading.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. O. M. Scott Credit Corp. v. Colorado Mercantile Co. · Matter of Clairmont Pharmacy, Inc.
  2. “(1) A financing statement is sufficient if it is signed by the debtor and the secured party, gives an address of the secured party from which information concerning the security interest may be obtained, gives a mailing address of the debtor and contains a statement indicating the types, or describing the items, of collateral 6 ______ 7 * * * 8”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re Kelton Motors, Inc. · 415 F. Supp. 238 - Matter of Reeco Elec. Co., Inc.
  3. “give the minimum information necessary to put any searcher on inquiry.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Leichter v. Friedman · In the Matter of Flying Mailmen Service, Inc., Bankrupt. Charles Gold v. Herbert K. Lippman, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Flying Mailmen Service, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.