Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 341 F.3d 126 - Hardy v. Walsh Manning Securities, L.L.C.

Hardy v. Walsh Manning Securities, L.L.C.’s Empirical Analysis

341 F.3d 126 · 2003

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
January 2023
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2023

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

150200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc. · Hopkins v. Reeves · Burchell v. Marsh · Harker v. United States · Baldonado v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “supported the conclusion that Skelly could be held primarily liable for securities fraud based upon his own conduct. Id. at 129 (quotation marks omitted). We held that the district court should not have undertaken such an assessment of the evidence: 57 The district court correctly found that a court must”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “confirm [an arbitrator's] award if [it is] able to discern any colorable justification for the arbitrator's judgment, even if that reasoning would be based on an error of fact or law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Westerbeke, 304 F.3d at 212, n. 8. There may indeed be more than enough evidence in the record to find that Skelly should have been found primarily liable. But that is not what”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.