Keo v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
341 F.3d 57 · 2003
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Jupiter v. Ashcroft (2005), Muhur v. Ashcroft (2004)
13 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Albathani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · El Moraghy v. Ashcroft · Yatskin v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the IJ noted that while Keo might legitimately fear retaliation or prosecution for abandoning his job as a police officer, such fears were not based on politically motivated persecution. Second, the IJ was not convinced that Keo's membership in FUNCINPEC was truly a matter of public knowledge in Cambodia, pointing out that Keo had testified that his membership was secret. Third, the IJ pointed out that even assuming that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“7 After considering Keo's testimony and asylum application along with the asylum officer's assessment and a 1999 State Department report on human rights practices in Cambodia, the IJ found that Keo had”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it was not a secret that [Keo] was a member of the FUNCINPEC Party, that party presently is part of a coalition in Cambodia ... and members of that party are sharing power with the CPP.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.