Schoch v. Infousa, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
341 F.3d 785 · 2003
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Brabham III v. Ag Edwards & Sons Incorporated Ag (2004), Wise v. Wachovia Securities, LLC (2006)
13 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on Stroh Container Company v. Delphi Industries Inc Delphi Industries Inc · Gateway Technologies, Inc. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp. · Roadway Package System, Inc. v. Kayser · Eljer Manufacturing Incorporated v. Kowin Development Corporation · Uhc Management Company Inc v. Computer Sciences Corporation Computer Sciences Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e will confirm the arbitrator's award even if we are convinced that the arbitrator committed serious error, so long as the arbitrator is even arguably construing or applying the contract and acting within the scope of his authority.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it fails to draw its essence from the agreement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is not clear, however, that parties have any say in how a federal court will review an arbitration award when Congress has ordained a specific, self-limiting procedure for how such a review is to occur [under the FAA].... Congress did not authorize de novo review of such an award on its merits; it commanded that when the exceptions do not apply, a federal court has no choice but to confirm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Van Horn v. Van Horn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.