United States v. Gary’s Empirical Analysis
341 F.3d 829 · 2003
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 13981 (§ 40302 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Kyles v. Whitley · United States v. Lopez · United States v. Morrison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Counce offered the defense that the individual he dropped off immediately before the police stopped him left the handgun in his car. 7 A defendant is entitled to a theory of defense instruction if a timely request is made, the evidence supports the requested instruction, and the instruction correctly states the law. Id. However, this does not guarantee a particular formulation of the proposed instruction. Id. The district court submitted Instruction No. 19, which defined actual and constructive possession. While the instructions did not define”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.