341 F. Supp. 1244 - Joyner v. Whiting’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000D
Relies on Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education · Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY · Green v. County School Board of New Kent County · Epperson v. Arkansas · Gomillion v. Lightfoot
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Any organization, association or group which has been established under the authority of North Carolina Central University and pursuant to its regulations, and which has received financial aid and support from North Carolina Central University, whether from funds received from North Carolina directly, out of taxes and escheats, or from funds collected by North Carolina Central University under the authority of North Carolina, or both, is an agency of North Carolina Central University and, therefore, indirectly, of North Carolina itself. The Campus Echo was established by North Carolina Central University, and, until September 24, 1971, was financially supported by North Carolina Central University. It received a portion of the student fee which North Carolina Central University required each student to pay as a prerequisite to registration. The Editor-in-Chief received a salary, though it is not clear whether this is paid from funds received through the student fee or from funds received through tuition and the contributions of North Carolina. The Campus Echo, as a matter of law, is an agency of North Carolina Central University and of North Carolina. The Editor-in-Chief of The Campus Echo is a salaried official of both North Carolina Central University and of North Carolina.” Joyner v. Whiting, supra, 341 F.Supp. at 1247 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“To those who find this assertion and this fact uncomfortable and/or intolerable I wish to make it perfectly clear that they must, while here, operate within the framework of the University policies regarding this. If this is not possible, then my advice is to seek enrollment and/or employment in institutions where such attitudes are acceptable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Joyner v. Whiting“by a program of harassment, discourtesy, and indicia of unwelcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Joyner v. Whiting
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.