341 F. Supp. 764 - Johnson v. Barthur Espey, Shearson, Hammill & Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2006 · most notably Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Curran (1982), Leist v. Simplot (1980)
13 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 7 U.S.C. § 1 · 7 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Hawes v. Oakland · Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co. · 69 F. Supp. 512 - Kardon v. National Gypsum Co. · 283 F. Supp. 417 - Hecht v. Harris, Upham & Co. · Gottesman v. General Motors Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to cheat or defraud or attempt to cheat or defraud such other person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“excessive trading in order to generate commissions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.