Wallander v. Barnes’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
2 district · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Fuentes v. Shevin · Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia · Department of Transportation v. Armacost · Keys v. Chrysler Credit Corp. · Saunders v. Mullinix
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Modern replevin in Maryland is a pre-judgment, but post-probable cause determination, seizure.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Except as provided in § 4-402 of this subtitle, and subject to the venue provisions of Title 6 of this article, the District Court has exclusive original civil jurisdiction in ... [a]n action of replevin, regardless of the value of the thing in controversy....” See also Md. Rule 12-601(a). Replevin is appropriate”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.