Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 341 Mo. 897 - Curry v. Dahlberg

Curry v. Dahlberg’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
5
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably 65 Cal. 2d 447 - Hallinan v. Committee of Bar Examiners (1966), Hulse v. Criger (1952)

2 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

120193719401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Oscanyan v. Arms Co. · Norman v. Baltimore & or · New York v. United States · Clark v. Austin · Missouri v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This court believes that it has the responsibility and the duty to concern itself both with regard to proper conduct of licensed practitioners and with unlawful practice of law by all others to the end that legal services required by the public, and essential to the administration of justice, will be rendered by those who have been found by investigation to be properly prepared to do so by conforming to strict educational standards, and who demonstrate that they have the character to conform to higher standards of ethical conduct than are ordinarily considered necessary in business relations which do not involve the same fiduciary and confidential relationships.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The purpose of the law of champerty and maintenance was to prevent officious intermeddling in the affairs of others for purposes of speculation or other unworthy motives, and to prevent the strong and influential men of early English times from oppressing the weak.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “any body, board, committee or commission constituted by law or having authority to settle controversies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.