Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 341 N.C. 19 - State v. McCullers

State v. McCullers’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

82 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably State v. Lee (1998), State v. Miller (2009)

82 state decisions

360199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Caldwell v. Mississippi · New Jersey v. New York · Keeble v. United States · State v. Rose

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “how his case would have been better prepared had the continuance been granted or that he was materially prejudiced by the denial of his motion.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An indigent defendant is entitled to the assistance of an expert in preparation of his defense when he makes a “particularized showing that (1) he will be deprived of a fair trial without the expert assistance, or (2) there is a reasonable likelihood that it would materially assist him in the preparation of his case.” State v. Parks, 331 N.C. 649, 656 , 417 S.E.2d 467, 471 (1992). “The particularized showing demanded by our cases is a flexible one and must be determined on a case-by-case basis.” Id. at 656-57 , 417 S.E.2d at 471 . “The determination of whether a defendant has made an adequate showing of particularized need lies within the trial court’s discretion.” State v. Rose, 339 N.C. 172, 187 , 451 S.E.2d 211, 219 (1994), cert. denied, — U.S. —, [132 L. Ed. 2d. 818 (1995)].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] postponement is proper if there is a belief that material evidence will come to light and such belief is reasonably grounded on known facts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.